Author |
Message |
General Laird
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 117
Location: Cheltenham
|
Posted:
Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:23 pm |
  |
I've created a 1500pt army based on CWC Vicotry in the Ages I didn't want too much artillery ( I shouldn't of bothered with Russians really ) and I wanted to know if this force was roughly historically accurate?? I know its a balanced gaming army but I lack knowledge of historical forces.
Diviisonal Commander
De Tolly
Brigade 4 Companies
Brigade 4 Companies
Brigade 4 Companies
Grenadier Brigade 4 Companies
1/2 Light Battalion Battery
1/2 Light Battalion Battery
Cossack Company 3 squadrons
Dragoon Company 3 squadrons
Dragoon Comapny 3 squadrons
Full Heavy Artillery Battery
I might take the Heavy artillery out and add more Light artillery and Infantry in it's place. |
|
|
     |
 |
Figjam
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 55
Location: Newcastle Australia
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:03 am |
  |
Here is a Russian force (Prebyshevsky's III column) from Austerlitz:
III Column total 5360 infantry & 30 guns
One brigade of a total 2 batts of Jagers
One brigade of a total of 2 regt (6 batts) of Musketeers
One brigade of a total of 1 batts of Jagers and 2 regt (6 batts) of Musketeers
The III column had no cavalry attached to it but all other columns including the Austrian column had Cossacks attached.
Keeping in mind that this rule set is at Brigade level, it looks OK to me. |
_________________ Figgy |
|
   |
 |
Figjam
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 55
Location: Newcastle Australia
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:08 am |
  |
Keep the Russians. Here is a scenario for you to consider.
Russia's Alaskan army invades Canada and the United States of America.
You can now have your Russians fighting British, US and the Spanish of California. |
_________________ Figgy |
|
   |
 |
General Laird
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 117
Location: Cheltenham
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:51 pm |
  |
Cheers very much for the Scenario ideas. I'll see what i can come up with to tie in with some of the other plans im working on for our version.
Thanks for the Russian inof but ocnfusing but i think i get the jist. Now i've got the fun of trying to sort out the models i need for representing some of the stuff. I have a mix of diffrent manufacturers that go well together but i've got loads of 9pdrs which i might use as heavy arty and buy some 6 pdrs for light as the 12pdr aren't much bigger than the 9. |
|
|
     |
 |
Del'pech
Joined: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 100
Location: Miami, FL
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:51 pm |
  |
That looks like a very solid list.I think you should drop the heavy artillery though.If you don't mind me asking,what do you think of this Russian list:
Brigadier General and adjutant-40
Line Battalion with four companies-150
Line Battalion with four companies-150
Conscript Line Battalion with six companies and two Grenadier companies-210
Conscript Line Battalion with six companies and two Grenadier companies-210
Conscript Line Battalion with six companies and two Grenadier companies-210
Light Infantry Battalion with four companies-150
Light Artillery Battery-55
Light Artillery Battery-55
Light Artillery Battery-55
Cossack Cavalry Company with three squadrons-125
Light Cavalry Company with three squadrons-100
Total=1510
A local player is interested in the Russians and I wanted to show him a sample list.It's a pretty simple list.The Infantry swamps the enemy in massive numbers and the cavalry and artillery support them. |
Last edited by Del'pech on Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
  |
 |
General Laird
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 117
Location: Cheltenham
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:37 pm |
  |
That's a superb list but the Conscript Line really need to be used as a battering ram so Inc Grendaiers in them be useful, The other line don't need to be so big if you've already got 3 units of 6. I'd definitely invest in Light infantry to protect the big assaut mass. And i'd look into having slighty more Light Cav or heavier cavalry units depending on your preference.
I took the Heavy Artillery for the fact i had 4 stands and it would force the enemy to advance or else i'd be able to sit back and pick him off. |
|
|
     |
 |
Del'pech
Joined: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 100
Location: Miami, FL
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:29 pm |
  |
Thanks! How's the new list? |
|
|
  |
 |
General Laird
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 117
Location: Cheltenham
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:15 pm |
  |
That's pretty spot on for an aggresive army. I'd like to see more Cavalry but you'd have to squeeze points from somewhere. |
|
|
     |
 |
|